Rubric

Scoring Rubric for Electronic Portfolio - Projects

Grade || (32 possible) |||| 32 ||
 * Project |||||||| Comments || Self Eval. || Final
 * Element #1 |||||||| The use of the blogger in the portfolio is well done. The student makes an argument for their own classroom as well. || 4 ||  ||
 * Element #2 |||||||| The student shows an example of a Wiki they have created. They also explain clearly how they plan to use the information. || 4 ||  ||
 * Google Docs |||||||| The student makes a great argument for why using google docs, specifically the forms, will work well in the classroom. || 4 ||  ||
 * Delicious Bookmarks |||||||| While the student may not see Delicious as needed in the classroom, the student shows how it could be used. || 4 ||  ||
 * Concept Map |||||||| The student clearly sees the benefit of concept maps in the classroom and how they will be used. || 4 ||  ||
 * Digital Story |||||||| The student shows a practical use of a digital story in the classroom. || 4 ||  ||
 * Web 2.0 Lesson Plan |||||||| The student has an inspired lesson plan that makes me want to teach it. It would work well in the classroom. || 4 ||  ||
 * Podcast / Element #3 |||||||| The student has exemplified what a podcast can do in the classroom. This student clearly deserves an A in all things ISTC. || 4 ||  ||
 * Grading Scale || Advanced (4 pts.) || Proficient (3 pts.) || Basic (2 pts.) || Below Basic (1 pts.) |||| Not Included (0 pts.) ||
 * ||  ||   ||   || Total Points

Scoring Rubric for Electronic Portfolio Eval. || Total || Reader might be confused. || Introduction/table of contents is not clearly stated. Reader will be not be able to determine the contents of the portfolio. || 3 ||  || A readily identifiable link back to the homepage is not available on each page. Contact information is available, but could be included on more pages. || The portfolio is unorganized. There are errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar. Internal navigation links are either not present or not functioning properly. Contact information is missing. || 3 ||  ||
 * Criteria || Advanced/Proficient (3 pts) || Basic (2 pts.) || Below Basic (0-1 pts.) || Self
 * Purpose of Portfolio || The introduction/table of contents explicitly mentions important concepts (such as breadth of content and intended audience) and prepares the reader for what is to come. || An introduction/table of contents is stated, but there is missing information.
 * Technology Integration and Content || Portfolio describes/exemplifies the model(s) to integrate technology to be utilized in the classroom. Specific teaching strategies to meet the needs of diverse learners are evident. All relevant course assignments/projects are included. || Portfolio describes/exemplifies ways to integrate technology but does not clearly describe specific teaching strategies to be utilized. Most relevant course assignments or projects are included. || Integration strategies/examples are missing. Very few or no relevant course assignments or projects are included. || 3 ||  ||
 * Teacher Technology Standards || ISTE-NETS and/ or PA Technology Standards are thorough and directly related and connected to each artifact within the electronic portfolio. || Some ISTE-NETS and/ or PA Technology standards are included and contain some information directly related and connected to each artifact in the electronic portfolio. || Connection of artifacts to ISTE-NETS and/ or PA Technology standards is incomplete or not included. || 3 ||  ||
 * Web Resources || Internet resources, related to specific academic content, are included as hyperlinks within the portfolio and include the title, URL, and description. Annotations indicate the web links have been evaluated by the author. Hyperlinks are properly functioning. || Internet resources, related to specific academic content, are included as hyperlinks within the portfolio and include the title, URL, and description. Limited text is included to indicate the web links have been evaluated by the author. Some hyperlinks may not be properly functioning. || Internet resources are limited or are missing. Hyperlinks to internet resources do not work and/or text describing the links is limited or missing. || 2 ||  ||
 * Overall Appeal || Type size and/or color, images, graphics and sounds are used well. Appropriate use of high contrast backgrounds and text are used. || There is some variation in type size, color, layout and use of graphics and sounds. Contrast in background/ text colors could use improvement. || There is little difference in contrast between text and background, OR color, graphics, sounds interfere with text, typography variations are overused and legibility suffers. || 3 ||  ||
 * Usability || The portfolio is well designed, logical and easy to maneuver. Information presented is error-free. On each page there is a readily identifiable link back to the homepage. Contact information is included where needed. || The portfolio is not intuitive, and needs further organization. Some errors may be present.
 * Self-Assessment || Portfolio contains a thorough and accurate self-assessment piece that explains what was learned and what grade should be earned. || Portfolio contains a limited, brief self-assessment piece that explains what was learned and may or may not detail what grade should be earned for the course. || Portfolio does not contain a self-assessment or earned grade. || 3 ||  ||
 * ||  ||   || Total (21 Pts. Possible) || 20 ||   ||